I show pages 156-157 that was submitted to the Supreme Court in a PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI showing that I had repeatedly filed motions claiming that the Commonwealth of PA fraudulently lied and committed fraud upon a Federal Court. This freaking court would not grant me a hearing to prove that PA had indeed committed fraud this Erie Federal Court. Shame on these freaking court. Then the FBI told me to get some smoking gun evidence: I have it.
Here’s just one of my Motions I filed to this Erie Federal Court:
Sorry my scanner could not get the ‘not’ correct as it looks like riot on the above page and I scanned it repeatedly.
Judge Baster states in the record above: As a result of the Motion of Limine the evidence of an assault and subsequent rape counseling was excluded. Jesus H Christ this was exculpatory evidence of perjury: how in the hell could any court in America exclude perjury evidence of their only key witness? I repeatedly filed that it was not excluded and that it was an obvious lie upon her court. This bitch implied f__k you Frank case closed! In other motions Baxter read my affidavits where they said they was present and heard some of Dave Ridge’s reasons for Frank to take a no contest plea: this bitch ruled that the affidavits were hearsay even though the info went from Dave Ridges’ mouth to their ears. One sick bitch in my book. How people like her are appointed as a Judge is pure insanity.
Yes Justice Baxter denied it repeatedly – she wrote in the record that it was not her duty to investigate any Fraud upon her court or words to that affect. She even stated that the DA did not supply any proof that it was excluded. You will soon see below that it was not excluded as I had the lower court records searched for any Motion of Limine that would have excluded my evidence. Almost committed suicide when I read that she wouldn’t grant me a Motion to verify the PA fraud upon her court. Yes the system is out of control.
The following is the SMOKING GUN PROOF against the Commonwealth of PA that they did indeed lie and committed fraud upon this Federal Court to hid their fraudulent conviction for misdemeanors. The following evidence was shown on pages 144-146 to our U.S. Supreme Court and they dismissed it. See for yourself, it seems to be black and white evidence for evidence of lies and fraud upon a court: at least for IQ’s higher than 70.
I ask how could any freaking court in America dismiss evidence proving that Kathryn went to the Rape Crisis Center and did received sexual counseling when Kathryn had denied under oath that she never went to a Rape Crisis Center and denied under oath that she had no sexual abuse counseling whatsoever. So ask yourself if your trying so show perjury and produce the perjury evidence how in the fuck can a court dismiss it? Well the Commonwealth can commit fraud and say the perjury evidence supplied by Frank proving perjury of their key witness was dismissed. Say again: Well the Commonwealth can commit fraud and say the perjury evidence supplied by Frank proving perjury of their key witness was dismissed.
Then I showed this bitch the Brady Law on pages 138-139 below from court records: Brady Court refers to nondisclosure of exculpatory evidence to defense counsel, (she implies again that Frank most be fucking retard because) that is not the case here, the exclusion of evidence at trial by way of an evidentiary ruling by the trial court. How in god’s name could anybody believe that exculpatory perjury evidence of the State’s key witness was somehow dismiss in a trial court: you have to be fucking nuts I guess. Obviously nothing ever dawns on this bitch when a friend tells her it was really dismissed. Maybe now you will see why I’m so freaking pissed off about the system? I can’t sue her because of her god damn immunity but she did commit a serious obstruction of justice and should be impeached and disbarred.
This bitch keeps repeating, the exclusion of evidence at trial based on a evidentiary ruling is a state court matter and cannot provide federal habeas corpus relief. I been there bitch and the exclusion of evidence at trial, based on an evidentiary ruling never fucking happened in any trial court which I been trying my damnest t0 tell you so how in the fuck can it be a state court matter? But let me add: I did send all this evidence back to the trial judge and that MF said I submitted the evidence too late. Again I state: how can perjury evidence ever be dismissed when it involves one key witness testimony especially when a fucking state like PA says one person’s testimony is enough for conviction? Get the fuck out of hear if that is true in the current legal system in America.